Legal Opinion
Hartley v. Sanders
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 11, 1932No. 21811PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. The testimony of the witnesses being in conflict as to the material issues involved, and there being some evidence to support the verdict in favor of the defendant, the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial upon the general grounds of the plaintiff’s motion therefor. McLendon v. Reynolds Grocery Co., 160 Ga. 763 (6) (129 S. E. 65).
2. It was not cause for a new trial that the court excluded the testimony referred to in the first special ground of the motion for a new trial, testimony to the same effect having been given by the same witness without objection in another part of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McLendon v. Reynolds Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Georgia Engineering & Construction Co. v. Horton & SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Ogburn v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Lee v. WinklesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Hall v. TreadawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Shahan v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Jones v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Kell v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.