Legal Opinion

Phenix Longhorn LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation, Hisense Electronica Mexico, S.A. de C.V., Hisense USA Corporation, Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd., and Does 1–10

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided December 22, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00477Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PHENIX LONGHORN LLC, § § Plaintiff, § v. § AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, § HISENSE ELECTRONICA MEXICO, § CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00477-RWS-RSP S.A. DE C.V., HISENSE USA § CORPORATION, HISENSE VISUAL § TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and § DOES 1–10, § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Portions of the Hybrid Witness Disclosures of Mr. Center Chen and Mr. Bear Syong. Dkt. No. 258. Because the Court carried Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 1, Dkt. No. 338 at 1–7, with respect to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnny Timpson v. Anderson County DisabilitiesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. Indianapolis Airport Authority v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. LaShip, LLC v. Hayward Baker, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
  4. Ancor Hold v. Landon CaptlCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API