Legal Opinion

Dockery v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 8, 1989No. 87-C-10763; CA A50361PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

The state appeals a judgment granting petitioner post-conviction relief. It contends that the statutory violation found by the trial court is not a basis for post-conviction relief. We agree and, therefore, reverse.

Petitioner pleaded no contest to a charge of first degree rape, ORS 163.375, and was sentenced to a 14-year term with a seven-year minimum. He filed a petition for post-conviction relief, alleging that the trial court had abridged his state and federal rights to due process and equal protection by failing to make the inquiry under ORS 135.395:

“After accepting a plea of guilty or no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Hartzog v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Riggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. State v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Kloss v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hunter v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API