Legal Opinion

Brateman v. Upper Channel Site Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1964No. 14004PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Justice.

Appellee sued appellants in trespass-to-try title to recover title and possession of 1.1 feet by 50 feet of Lot No. 9, Block 337, Southside of Buffalo Bayou, in the City of Houston. Appellants filed a cross-action contending the strip involved was a part of Lot No. 8 of said Block. The dispute involves the true southern boundary of Lot No. 9 which would be the northern boundary of Lot No. 8. The jury found the south boundary of Lot 9 to be located 102.7 feet south of the south line of Bell Avenue, as contended for by appellee and the court rendered judgment on the verdict…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Whitman v. HaywoodTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hurt v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Angelina County Lumber Co. v. McKnightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Reynolds v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nabours v. WhiteleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Fred A. Chapman, Jr. And William C. Chapman v. Norman Moser and Wife, Laura Allen MoserCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Brateman v. Upper Channel Site Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Chapman v. MoserCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. City of Missouri City v. SeniorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API