Legal Opinion

George W. Saunders Live Stock Commission Co. v. Kincaid

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1914No. 7986PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; Marvin H. Brown, Judge. Action by A. H. Kincaid against the George W. Saunders Live Stock Commission Company and another, in which Armour & Co. was made a party. From a judgment for plaintiff against defendant the George W. Saunders Live Stock Commission Company, and in favor of defendant Womble and Armour & Co. against plaintiff and the Stock Commission Company, the Stock Commission Company alone appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

A. H. Kincaid filed this suit against the George W. Saunders Live Stock Commission Company and J. A. Womble for loss and damage on 220 hogs purchased of them; the plaintiff's petition alleging that the hogs were diseased when he bought them. It was alleged that defendants had represented the hogs to be sound, and that plaintiff had relied on such representations, and, upon discovering the diseased condition of the hogs, had shipped them back -to the defendant, demanding the return of $1,720 he had paid for them. The plaintiff further alleged that the defendant George W. Saunders Live Stock…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heath v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Gaal v. CampCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Needham v. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Stephenville, N. & S. T. Ry. Co. v. WheatCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Gulf, T. & W. Ry. Co. v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Pearson v. LaffertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Silver v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API