Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Perez-Diaz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 16, 2016No. 3D14-2885Published

1ConcurrenceEmas, J.

I concur fully,' but write separately' to address more broadly one of the points made in the majority opinion.

The trial court imposed a downward departure sentence, concluding that the departure was necessary to achieve “sentencing parity” and to correct what the court perceived to be a “gross disparity” be-twéen Perez-Diaz’s guideline sentence and the negotiated sentence imposed on the co-defendant. I conclude that, given the circumstances of the instant case, this is not a permissible basis for a downward departure.

As the majority opinion notes, a trial court does have the discretion, under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. State v. HodgesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. State v. BowmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. State v. FernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API