Legal Opinion
Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC v. X-Body Equipment, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 13, 2020No. 2:16-cv-00148Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADVANCED STEEL RECOVERY, LLC, No. 2: 16-cv-00148-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff/Counter-defendant, 13 v. ORDER 14 X-BODY EQUIPMENT, INC., JEWELL ATTACHMENTS, LLC, J.D.M.L., INC. dba 15 STANDARD INDUSTRIES, and ALLSTATE PAPER & METAL RECYCLING CO., INC., 16 Defendants/Counterclaimants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff Advanced Steel Recovery (ASR) sues defendants X-Body Equipment, 20 Inc. (X-Body) and Jewell Attachments, LLC (Jewell)1 alleging defendants’ “Acculoader” product 21 infringes ASR’s patent. X-Body and Jewell filed…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.