Legal Opinion

Senters v. Big Sandy Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 12, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Miller

Affirming.

The appellants, as the children and heirs-at-law of Huldah Senters, deceased, brought this action to quiet their title to one hundred acres of land which was conveyed to their mother by William Ramey in 1886. In 1887 appellants’ mother and father conveyed the coal and mineral rights in said land to the Virginia Mining & Improvement Co., and by mesne conveyances those rights have been conveyed to, and are now owned by the appellee, Big Sandy Company.

Huldah Senters and her husband, Stephen H. Senters, are dead. Appellants claim that their mother took…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Davis v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  3. Pritchard v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  4. Big Sandy Co. v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kirby v. HuletteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Texas Co. v. MeadorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Wilson v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Belcher v. RameyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Meisberg v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API