Legal Opinion

Kuntz v. Kuntz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1928No. Docket No. 70, Calendar No. 33,570PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

In the hill of complaint filed herein the plaintiff alleges:

1. The marriage of the parties in 1906 at the city of Pittsburgh, in the State of Pennsylvania.

2. The birth of four children, three of whom are now living, of the respective ages of 16, 14, and 12-years.

3. That plaintiff has worked daily during his married life and turned his earnings over to defendant for deposit and investment in their joint names.

4. That plaintiff and defendant, on March 15, 1924, were the owners of a home in Pittsburgh, and on that fiay sold it for $6,100, which money “defendant represented she was placing in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Artman v. FergusonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Moore v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Jenne v. MarbleMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Heckman v. HeckmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Root v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lutz v. DutmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. In re Burnett EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Heckelman v. HeckelmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Estate of Awrey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  5. Bates v. BeckmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API