Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

PPEAL from the District Court of the Parish of St. Helena, Wilson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

This is a redhibitory action for a disease in a slave, sold by defendant to plaintiff. The appellant asks for the reversal of a judgment, on the ground, among others, that no tender of the slave is either alleged or proved.

It is the well settled doctrine, that allegation and proof of a tender are indis-pensible to recovery in an action of this kind ; and that the tender should be made, if practicable, before the institution of the suit. 2 N. S. 466 ; 4 La. 193 ; 19 La. 283; 9 Rob. 306 ; 1 An. 389 ; 2 An. 955 ; 4 An. 562 ; 10 An. 127 ; 11 An. 209.

Two exceptions to this general rule, are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dixon v. Dixon's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  2. Fazende v. HaganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beneficial Finance Co. v. BienemyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. McLain v. CucciaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Alan Randal Co. v. Quality Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Thomas v. LavigneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Virginia Shipbuilding Corp. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API