Legal Opinion

State v. Paul

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 6, 1993No. 920517-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Judge:

The State challenges the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss. We affirm.

FACTS

While confined as a prisoner in the Salt Lake County Jail, defendant allegedly spit on a correctional officer in May 1992. He was charged with assault on a correctional officer in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-102.6 (Supp.1993). The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss, holding that defendant’s conduct did not violate section 76-5-102.6. This appeal followed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The State’s appeal turns on the interpretation of section 76-5-102.6. Questions of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brinkerhoff v. ForsythUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ward v. Richfield CityUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. West Jordan v. MorrisonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hanchett v. BurbidgeUtah Supreme Court · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Utah County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  2. State in Interest of A.B.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  3. State v. WinwardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  4. Mt. Olympus Waters, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  5. Patterson v. UTAH CTY. BD. OF ADJUSTMENTCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API