Legal Opinion

Austerman (John) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 2014No. 64083Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Both components of the inquiry must be shown, Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697, and the petitioner must demonstrate the underlying facts by a preponderance of the evidence, Means v. State, 120 Nev. 1001, 1012,

103 P.3d 25, 33

(2004). We give deference to the district court's factual findings if supported by substantial evidence and not clearly erroneous but review the court's application of the law to those facts de novo. Lader v. Warden, 121 Nev. 682, 686,

120 P.3d 1164, 1166

(2005). First, appellant argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for arguing for life sentences in this case and for not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Castillo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lader v. Warden, Northern Nevada Correctional CenterNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Means v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Howard v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API