Legal Opinion

Administrator of Townsend v. Lorain Bank

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1853Published

Error to the court of common pleas of Erie county. Beserved in Erie county. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

*307The opinion of the court was delivered by

Ranney, J.

The action below was brought upon a bill of exchange for $3,000, drawn by Morgan & Co., upon Marshall, Burton & Co., in favor of W. W. Witherell, and payable on the 4th day of June, 1849, at the office of H. J. Morgan in the city of New York. The bill was indorsed by Witherell to the plaintiff’s intestate, and by him to the defendant in error. It was duly protested at maturity for non-payment, and the following notice sent by the notary to Townsend :

“ $3,000. “ New York, June 2, 1849.
“ Please take notice, that a bill for $3,000, drawn by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mills v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Bank of Columbia Ex Rel. Bank of United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  3. Hammar v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1861
  4. Remer v. DownerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1840
  5. Rhett v. PoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1844

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API