Legal Opinion

State v. Stroud

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1997No. 66134PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*31ORDER

2Per curiam

Defendant, Vernon Stroud, appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict, convicting him of three counts of sodomy, Section 566.060 RSMo 1986, and one count of sexual abuse in the first degree, Section 566.100 RSMo 1986. Defendant argues the trial court first erred in allowing the admission of double hearsay testimony possessing insufficient indicia of reliability. In his second point, defendant argues the trial court erred in the admission of certain evidence. The defendant failed to preserve the alleged claims of error. We review for plain error.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties…

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stroud v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Stroud v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API