Legal Opinion

Hale v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1920No. 5709PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The Assistant Attorney General moves to dismiss this appeal because of the fact appellant did not enter into a recognizance during term time but gave an appeal bond. Where an appeal is prosecuted in a felony case the accused may enter into a recognizance during the term at which the conviction was had, and failing in this he may, after the adjournment of court, in vacation, enter into an appeal bond under the terms prescribed by the statute. Appellant did not enter into a recognizance during term time, but before the court adjourned did give an appeal bond, which was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zepeda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Albidrez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Gilmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Hendricks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API