Legal Opinion
99 Realty Co. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 20, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order dated November 15, 1993 reversed, with $10 costs, landlord’s motion for partial summary judgment is granted on the issue of adjusted electricity charges due landlord, and tenant’s cross motion to amend the seventh affirmative defense and counterclaim denied, without prejudice.
Order dated March 22, 1994 reversed, with $10 costs, and tenant’s motion for disclosure is denied as moot.
Contrary to the finding of the court below, tenant’s contest of landlord’s claim for additional rent for electricity charges lies, in the first instance, in the arbitration process provided…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Rio Algom, Inc. v. Sammi Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Avon Products, Inc. v. SolowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Olympia & York OLP Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Sauer v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- 99 Realty Co. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1997