Legal Opinion

Manning v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 10, 2014No. 13-3693PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

After the District Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion to remand this case to New Jersey state court, we granted their petition for an interlocutory appeal. The issue before us is whether there is federal-question jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ state-law claims, which allege that defendants manipulated the price of a stock via abusive “naked” short sales. Short sales are subject to detailed federal regulation under Regulation SHO. New Jersey does not have an analogous provision. However, the question of whether the naked short selling at issue in this case violates New…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. ManningSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Estate of Joseph Maglioli v. Alliance HC Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  3. City of Greensburg v. WisneskiDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Great Lakes Gas Transmission Ltd. Partnership v. Essar Steel Minnesota, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  5. Van Scyoc v. Equitrans, L.P.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API