Legal Opinion
Washburn v. Douthit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 8, 1934No. 9920PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
Appellees recovered judgment against appellants because of the alleged negligence of the appellants. The cause of action grew out of a collision between two automobiles. In their petition, the plaintiffs below alleged, in substance, that Howard Douthit was riding in an automobile owned by the defendant Shell Petroleum Corporation and driven by the defendant R. M. Washburn along a highway near Clarksville, Ark.; that Washburn was driving this car as the agent and employee of the Shell Petroleum Corporation and negligently operated the vehicle so as to cause Douthit to be…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Accident Insurance v. CrandalSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. MaresSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Wilson v. EverettSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co. v. HortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- German Ins. Co. of Freeport v. FrederickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Winebrenner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- George W. O'malley, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Nebraska v. Noel CoverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Tetzke v. Trust No. 2988 of Foreman Trust & Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Century Indemnity Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.