Zarski v. Schmidt
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtM. Henry Martuscello, J.
Defendants move pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it has no merit. The complaint alleges in substance that the plaintiffs and the defendants Albina Zarski Schmidt, Alexandra Z. Gorman and Constance Zarski are brothers and sisters and are the children of Nicholas Zarski and Mary Zarski, both of whom are now dead; that the seven pieces of improved real property involved in this action were purchased by the father and paid for with his personal funds, but for his convenience the said properties, at various times…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Sinclair v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Foreman v. ForemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- McKenna v. MeehanNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Zim v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927