Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ross v. Robb

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1983No. WD32540Published

1DissentManford, Judge

This dissent is filed, not only upon the belief that the majority opinion makes an incorrect disposition of the question of jurisdiction, but for the purpose of discussing what is felt to be other inaccuracies in the majority opinion.

Three specific matters are addressed by this dissent. First, challenge is made to the majority’s discussion and disposition relative to the ruling of the circuit court. Second, challenge is made to the majority’s disposition concerning the validity of respondent’s having raised a constitutional question. The final matter is the submission of an opinion relative…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Phipps v. School District of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Winston v. REORGANIZED SCH. DIST. R-2, ETC.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. BD. OF ED., MT. VERNON SCHOOLS, ETC. v. ShankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  5. State Ex Rel. Bond v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API