Legal Opinion
Knight v. Tucker
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 16, 2016No. 50,993-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPitman, J.
I,Plaintiff John David Knight sued Defendants Barney Tucker (individually) and Donald, Tucker, Betts, Fuller & Knight, A.P.A.C., under La. R.S. 23:631, et seq., seeking unpaid wages, 90 days’ penalty wages and attorney fees, and also overtime compensation and liquidated damages under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. Plaintiff also sought damages for reimbursement of business expenses. The trial court granted *410Plaintiff relief as to unpaid wages, but denied his claim in all other respects and rendered judgment in favor of Defendants finding that Plaintiff…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Beals v. New Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church of Delhi, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- U.L. Coleman Co. v. GossleeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Carver v. Capital Area Transit SystemDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Franks Inv. Co. v. ShawLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- Franks Inv. Co. v. ShawLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.