Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Graham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1953No. Docket 18, Calendar 45,366PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

Plaintiff, a residential builder living in Michigan, brought this action at law to recover the balance due him from defendant for labor and materials furnished defendant under a contract for the alteration of defendant’s dwelling house in Grosse Pointe, in Wayne county. The court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss because the declaration did not allege that plaintiff had a residential builder’s license, which allegation is required by section 19 of the act hereinafter referred to. Plaintiff appeals.

Involved in this appeal is the validity of PA 1939, No 311, as amended by PA 1945, No 315.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Dingeman v. LacyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Winkler v. BenzenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Tribbett v. Village of MarcellusMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Mulloy v. Wayne County Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Chamski v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Irishman's Lot, Inc. v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc. v. City of RomulusMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Tracer v. BushreMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Green v. Court AdministratorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API