Legal Opinion

Gray v. Pashkow

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment denied.

The parties were married in 1958 and their son, Peter, was born in 1959. He suffers from the learning and developmental disability of autism, for which he has had special education and care. The plaintiff mother and defendant father were divorced in 1966. The judgment incorporated their separation agreement of that year, which provided in pertinent part:

"whereas, [Peter] is now attending The Bancroft School in Haddonfield, New Jersey, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MATTER OF MECCICO v. MeccicoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Hoffman v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Gray v. PashkowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cortese v. RedmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Attea v. AtteaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Derasmo v. DerasmoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Bianculli v. BianculliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Boland v. BolandNew York Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API