Johnson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Judge.
In these consolidated appeals,1 the issue before this court is whether a claimant who is receiving unemployment compensation benefits during a work stoppage and chooses to retire should continue receiving benefits.
Kenneth Johnson and David Hallman (hereinafter referred to collectively as claimants) appeal from two separate orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review which affirm the referee’s denial of benefits to claimants pursuant to section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).2 We affirm.
*732Johnson and Hallman worked for Occidental Chemical Corporation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- High v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Stiffler v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Pacini v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Campbell Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brunswick Hotel & Conference Center, LLC v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Sanders v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Petrill v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Johnson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998