Legal Opinion

Harlow v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided November 8, 1991No. A-3633PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Judge.

Brian Harlow was convicted, based upon his plea of nolo contendere, of theft in the second degree, AS 11.46.130, and misconduct involving weapons in the first degree, AS 11.61.200. Both offenses are class C felonies. The sole issue on appeal in this case is whether Superior Court Judge Jay Hodges erred in treating Harlow as a second felony offender for purposes of presumptive sentencing.

Judge Hodges concluded that Harlow was a second felony offender. He found that a mitigating factor applied to Harlow’s sentencing, 1 and imposed a mitigated presumptive sentence for theft…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  2. Garroutte v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
  3. Wasson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rozkydal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
  2. Timothy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2004
  3. Burnette v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  4. State v. DelagarzaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
  5. Butts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API