Legal Opinion

Falberg v. Continental Casualty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 1, 1915No. Gen. No. 20,407PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit on an accident insurance policy. On the trial the court instructed the jury to find the issues for the plaintiff and to assess the damages at $1,000. Judgment was entered on the verdict.

The application for insurance is in part as follows:

“I hereby apply for insurance in.the Continental Casualty Company based upon the following statements, and I agree that any failure on the part of myself, my heirs, legal representatives or beneficiary to comply with the provisions, conditions and agreements of this Application,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Continental Casuality Co. v. LindsaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  2. Gaines v. . Fidelity Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Duenser v. Supreme Council of the Royal ArcanumIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. McKinney v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter v. Employees' Benefit Ass'n of American Steel FoundriesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918
  2. LaRocca v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1940
  3. Young v. Union Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API