Legal Opinion
Falberg v. Continental Casualty Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 1, 1915No. Gen. No. 20,407PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a suit on an accident insurance policy. On the trial the court instructed the jury to find the issues for the plaintiff and to assess the damages at $1,000. Judgment was entered on the verdict.
The application for insurance is in part as follows:
“I hereby apply for insurance in.the Continental Casualty Company based upon the following statements, and I agree that any failure on the part of myself, my heirs, legal representatives or beneficiary to comply with the provisions, conditions and agreements of this Application,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Continental Casuality Co. v. LindsaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
- Gaines v. . Fidelity Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Duenser v. Supreme Council of the Royal ArcanumIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- McKinney v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carter v. Employees' Benefit Ass'n of American Steel FoundriesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918
- LaRocca v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1940
- Young v. Union Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916