Legal Opinion

Jaikins v. Jaikins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1963No. Calendar 18, Docket 49,764PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Of the hitter and irreconcilable testimony given in this tragic divorce case, the least set forth in our reports the better for the minor children of the parties, particularly when they have grown to read and comprehend. Their interests surely are primary.

At conclusion of a grimly contested 9-day hearing the trial judge denied a divorce to both parties on bill and cross-bill. Both appeal. Each insists that he or she should have a decree as prayed. The trial judge filed no findings of fact with respect to the issues presented by bill and cross-bill and contented himself with summary ruling set…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brookhouse v. BrookhouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hitchman v. Township of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. CusickMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Vial v. VialMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hawthorne v. DunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nicpon v. NicponMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Jaikins v. JaikinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Cosgrove v. CosgroveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  4. Propst Faith Pittman v. Ty Lathan PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Zamfir v. ZamfirMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API