Legal Opinion
Committee for an Independent P-I v. Smith
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided August 27, 1982No. C82-730RPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the court upon cross motions for summary judgment by the four parties. Having reviewed the motions, memoranda of counsel, and the entire record, the court finds and rules as follows:
I. BACKGROUND
The Seattle Times Company (“Times”) and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer (“P-I”) have been for many years the only two metropolitan daily newspapers in Seattle. On March 27, 1981 the Times and the Hearst Corporation (“Hearst”), as publisher of the P-I, filed an application with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zenian v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Hawaii Newspaper Agency v. BronsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Hawaii Newspaper Agency v. BronsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Application for Approval of a Joint Operating Arrangement Under the Newspaper Preservation Act, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1982