Legal Opinion

Westfall v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1924No. Nos. 4116-4118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Complaint is made that, in this prosecution for conspiracy, evidence was received of overt acts other than those specified in the, indictment. The record shows no objection or exception.

We are also told that for lack of necessary proof a verdict of acquittal should have been directed; but, again, the record shows no motion for a directed verdict, nor any objection or exception raising that point. It is the settled rule in this court that section 269 of the Judicial Code, as amended (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 1246), was not intended to promote reversals by removing the necessity for any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robilio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Cook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Raymond J. Kasper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API