Legal Opinion

Peirce-Phelps, Inc. ex rel. Heller v. Julason

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1981No. Nos. 2630 and 1106Published

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

These cross-appeals arise out of the refusal of the court below to direct the satisfaction of a judgment without prejudice to the defendant petitioner’s right to contest the precise amount due the use plaintiff in a further proceeding. Defendant appeals because the court did not direct the satisfaction of the judgment, and use plaintiff cross appeals because the court dismissed the amended petition without prejudice. Since no appellate review lies under the circumstances, the appeals must be dismissed.

The facts are somewhat complicated. Suffice it to say, for the purpose of this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Prager v. WarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Smith v. WitmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API