Nichols v. Bolding
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentHeflin, Chief Justice
The firefighters’ only contention of error is that the final decree of the trial court should have held that a written agreement between the City and the firefighters was permissible(1) if the City agrees to enter into a written agreement;(2) if the agreement is terminable at will by the city; and(3) if the agreement is subject to the continuing legislative discretion of the City.
*59The Firefighters’ Act (Act No. 229, Acts of Alabama, 1967, Regular Session, approved August 16, 1967) assured all firefighters serving the state or any municipality in the state the right and freedom of association,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Keith Theatre Inc. v. VachonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
- People v. Distributors Division, Smoked Fish Workers Union, Local No. 20377New York Supreme Court · 1938