Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Federal Land Bank

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1935No. File No. 7790PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

An action was instituted by the trustee of the Reeves estate for the cancellation of the defendant bank’s mortgage foreclosure. It would appear that the mortgage in question became effective in 1925; that at that time there were in effect certain statutes relating to mortgage foreclosure by advertisement, namely, sections 2876 to 2886, 19x9 South Dakota Revised Code. Section 2879 provided that the notice of foreclosure must be published once a week for six consecutive weeks. The Legislature by chapter 177 of the S. D. Session Laws for the year 1929 shortened the time of publication by stating…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  2. Fogarty v. SawyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. State ex rel. Wheeler v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. State ex rel. Waldo v. FylpaaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Mortimer v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Judd v. City Trust & Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. James v. ChapmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. SlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API