Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schooley v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1931No. Appeal 31PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This is an appeal by the use plaintiff from a judgment for the defendant on a question of law raised by its affidavit of defense.

William M. Moser had a contract with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to furnish and deliver all materials and to perform all work and labor in the improvement of a certain section of state highway by the construction of a concrete road, including two bridges, which were also to be built of concrete. The contractor gave to the Commonwealth a bond, on which the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, defendant, was surety, conditioned for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. H. H. Robertson Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Philadelphia v. Jackson & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Commonwealth v. Empire State Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia School District v. B. A. Shrages Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Independent Bridge Co. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Commonwealth v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Independent Bridge Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Girard Construction Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API