Legal Opinion

Albina Engine & Machine Works v. O'leary

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1964No. 18545PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

The sole question on this appeal is whether the District Court erred in sustaining the determination of the Deputy Commissioner that Hilda O’Brien was the'“surviving wife” of John C. O’Brien, within the meaning of Section 909 of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 44 Stat. 1424 (1927), 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950.

The meaning of the statute is, of course, a question of federal law. However, since the statute does not define the term “surviving wife,” 1 and since marital status is ordinarily determined by local law, it has been assumed that Congress…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Travers v. ReinhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. KenneySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Wadsworth v. BrighamOregon Supreme Court · 1927

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Santiago v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1973
  2. James Eastman v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  3. Albina Engine And Machine Works v. J. J. O'learyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API