Wichita County Water Improvement Dist. No. 1 v. Pearce
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CONNER, Chief Justice.
In 1924 a number of enterprising and forward-looking citizens of Wichita Falls organized, in accord with the terms of title 128, Rev. Civ. Statutes of 1925, what is known as “Water Improvement District No. 1,” and for the purpose of furnishing water for irrigation to lands within its district constructed two large dams on the Wichita river, one known as Lake Kemp and the other as Diversion Lake. From the latter lake the district constructed an irrigation ditch extending in an easterly direction on the north side of the river along the foothills or higher ground of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Dallas v. MaxwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Houston Water Works v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Austin & Northwestern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Clark v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Little Schuylkill Navigation, Railroad & Coal Co. v. Richards's AdministratorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lay v. Aetna Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Houston Natural Gas Corporation v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. 1 v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Smith v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.