Legal Opinion
CRAMMOND
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2001No. ID 3457PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 179
(BIA 2001) Interim Decision #3457 In re Robin Juraine CRAMMOND, Respondent File A41 925 300 - San Pedro Decided October 16, 2001 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) The Board of Immigration Appeals lacks jurisdiction over a motion to reopen where the motion is withdrawn, within the meaning of
8 C.F.R. § 3.2(d) (2001), by the departure of the alien from the United States prior to a ruling on the motion. (2) When the Board is presented with evidence that it has granted a motion to reopen after the alien’s…
2Cited by14 opinions
- En Hui Huang v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Mikhail Bovkun v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- SMALLBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
- Bovkun v. US Atty GenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Gattem, Srivenugopal v. Gonzales, Alberto R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.