Legal Opinion

Bridgford v. Barbour

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 7, 1882PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Case 99 — EQUITY APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. 1. Appellant Bridgford, as assignee for the benefit of Bowles’ creditors,’is a purchaser for a valuable consideration without notice. 2. There is no Us pendens as to any lien upon James Bowles’ interest in the undivided estate of his father. 3. Even if any lien existed for rents collected as between the parties, Bridgford, as assignee for the benefit of creditors, is not affected by it, nor is he concluded by any…

Read the full summary

Case 99 — EQUITY APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. 1. Appellant Bridgford, as assignee for the benefit of Bowles’ creditors,’is a purchaser for a valuable consideration without notice. 2. There is no Us pendens as to any lien upon James Bowles’ interest in the undivided estate of his father. 3. Even if any lien existed for rents collected as between the parties, Bridgford, as assignee for the benefit of creditors, is not affected by it, nor is he concluded by any judgment declaring the existence of such equitable lien. (Mason v. Peck, 7 J. J. Mar., 302; Wickliffe v. Breckinridge, 1 Bush,…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE PRYOR

delivered the opinion of the court.

A part of the present record, involving a settlement of the estate of Joshua B. Bowles, deceased, has' been heretofore in this court, and the rights of his heirs and devisees finálly disposed of as to the issues then made. The principal issue determined on the former hearing was as to the nature and character of advancements made to each of his heirs and devisees. What constituted an advancement, and when the advancement was to be charged, were questions that had necessarily to be determined before a final settlement and division of the estate…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Holloway v. HollowaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co. v. McFarland's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Reid v. Owensboro Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Alexander v. Owen CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Central Appalachian Co. v. BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API