Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 18, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was tried in the Paterson District Court, without a jury, and judgment went for the plaintiff for $300.

The action was predicated upon defendant’s negligence in negligently permitting to be placed in its beverage, in a bottle, a foreign substance, i. e., a piece of suspender strap, which contaminated its product, and made the same so unwholesome and deleterious as to subject the plaintiff to sickness. The beverage was known as “Coca-Cola” and was sold to the retail trade for public consumption. The plaintiff, while drinking the fluid, noticed the illusive human appendage safely…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Blount v. Houston Coca Cola Bottling Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Cassini v. Curtis Candy Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Lajoie v. BilodeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
  4. Texas Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. KubenaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Gross v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API