Legal Opinion · Dissent

Inc. Consultants v. Todd

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1964No. 37883Published

1DissentGibson, J.

The rule for application in the instant case was stated clearly by this court in the first paragraph of the syllabus in Lincoln Tavern, Inc., v. Snader (1956), 165 Ohio St., 61, as follows:

“A proceeding to vacate a judgment on the ground that it is void for want of jurisdiction is not subject to the provisions of Section 2325.01 et seq., Revised Code, which apply to the vacation or modification of only those judgments which are merely voidable and not those which are void ah initio.”

Also, see Celina Mutual Ins. Co. v. Duke, a Minor (1961), 113 Ohio App., 241. Consequently, the issue in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zwick & Zwick v. Suburban Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. Clark v. AllamanOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Donovan v. DeckerOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Celina Mutual Insurance v. DukeOhio Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API