Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 24, 2007No. A05-857Published

1DissentPage, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The court concludes that only a reasonable articulable suspicion was necessary before police used a canine to detect the odor of narcotics coming from Davis’s apartment. Because I conclude that the dog sniff was a search of Davis’s apartment, not the hallway outside of the apartment, I would require that police have probable cause, rather than merely reasonable suspicion, to conduct the dog sniff. I would therefore exclude the results of the dog sniff as a basis for the warrant used to enter Davis’s apartment. Without the results of the dog sniff, police lacked…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API