Legal Opinion

United States v. Domingo Pimental

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 23, 1992No. 1567, Docket 91-1744PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge: .

In this appeal from convictions for interfering with the federally protected rights of an informant by killing him and for bail-jumping, the appellant contends that the statute under which he was convicted for interference with federally protected rights, 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(1)(B) (1988), requires a racial or discriminatory motive which was neither alleged nor proved,- and that the district court erroneously instructed the jury on both the § 245 and bail-jumping counts. We reject these contentions and affirm the convictions.

I

After a jury trial in the United States…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. Vincent Pecelli, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Rajindar K. ManiktalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Piervinanzi, Daniel Tichio, John M. Bookhart, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Robert J. Conner v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API