United States v. Domingo Pimental
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge: .
In this appeal from convictions for interfering with the federally protected rights of an informant by killing him and for bail-jumping, the appellant contends that the statute under which he was convicted for interference with federally protected rights, 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(1)(B) (1988), requires a racial or discriminatory motive which was neither alleged nor proved,- and that the district court erroneously instructed the jury on both the § 245 and bail-jumping counts. We reject these contentions and affirm the convictions.
I
After a jury trial in the United States…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Vincent Pecelli, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Rajindar K. ManiktalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Michael Piervinanzi, Daniel Tichio, John M. Bookhart, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Robert J. Conner v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997