Legal Opinion

Diversacon Industries, Inc. v. Graham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 31, 1983No. AN-292PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Diversacon appeals an order finding that a use tax was due on a dredge and a judgment assessing that tax. We affirm.

Diversacon contends that its dredge never came to rest in Florida or became part of the mass of property in this State. Its dredge was constructed in Texas and is designed and intended for “the world dredging market.” The dredge’s first job and shakedown was on the Kissimmee River. During this project the dredge earned 3 million dollars and moved 26 million cubic yards of fill during a 20-month period. The dredge then traveled to Brazil.

While materials for export…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Department of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bean Dredging Corp. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API