Legal Opinion

Miller v. Schenck

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 9, 1889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Jackson District Court. — Hon. A. J. Lefeingwell, Judge. Action for the abatement of a nuisance, and to recover damages alleged to have been caused by it, and to enjoin defendant from obstructing an alleged highway. The cause was tried to the court, and a part of the relief demanded by plaintiff was granted. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

Plaintiff owns and resides upon a farm which includes the west one-half and. northeast quarter of the northeast quarter, and the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section 8, .township 87 north, of range 3 east, and defendant owns all the northwest quarter of the same section, excepting a schoolhouse site. Plaintiff claims that there is a duly-established public highway through the northern and northeastern part of defendant’s land, which the latter has obstructed by building fences across it; that said obstructions interfered with the free and proper use of plaintiff’s premises,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Park v. C. & S. W. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Donnelly v. Cedar CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nebraska Innkeepers, Inc. v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Lewisburg & N. R. v. HindsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Husband v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Moffitt v. BrainardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. Morgan County v. GoansTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API