Legal Opinion

Solt v. Anderson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1903No. 9,457PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Hamilton county. Action by administratrix to enforce specific performance of contract made with her intestate. Heard below before Sedgwick, J. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, C.

This cause has given the court a great deal of trouble, because of the condition of the pleadings and the many questions to which the peculiar course by which the issues were made up has given rise. Briefly restated, the case is this: Lusetta Solt, widow and administratrix of Jacob Solt, brought this suit against Anderson, joining the heirs at law of the intestate, as required by section 335a,* chapter 23, Compiled Statutes, setting up a contract “entered into” between said Jacob Solt, in his lifetime, and said Anderson, for the sale of certain land held by Solt, and praying for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Le Mesnager v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bender v. LuckenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Hyde v. HellerWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Larkin v. PaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Blanco v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Fenby v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Solt v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Illinois National Bank v. HolmesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API