Legal Opinion

Hill v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 30, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Circuit Judge.

The motion to remand is denied, on the authority of, Harry Porter Co. v. U. S. S. B. E. F. C. (D. C.) 284 Fed. 397, decided by Judge Augustus N. Hand, of this court, on Janu*399ary 9, 1922. See, too, Sloan Shipyards Corporation v. U. S. S. B. E. F. C. (D. C.) 272 Fed. 132, and Astoria Marine Iron Works v. U. S. S. B. E. F. C., 258 U. S. -, 42 Sup. Ct. 386, 66 L. Ed. -, decided by the United States Supreme Court on May 1, 1922.

Plaintiff urges, however, that the cause must be remanded because of the alleged absence of any statutory provision for removal by a resident of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. McCabeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. Harry Porter Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922
  4. Orr v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1914
  5. Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1924
  2. Delpit v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  3. Atlantic Corp. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1923
  4. James v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Katz v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API