Legal Opinion
O'NEAL v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 9, 1954No. 1482PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of violating Title 33-416 of the District of Columbia Code, which reads as follows:
“Any store, shop, warehouse, dwelling-house, building, vehicle, boat, aircraft, or any place whatever, which is resorted to by narcotic drug addicts for the purpose of using narcotic- drugs or which is used for the illegal keeping or selling of the same, shall be deemed a common nuisance. No person shall keep or maintain such a common nuisance.”
At the trial it was shown that Johnson, an undercover agent for the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, had made…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Accarino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Gatewood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Gee Woe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bunter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Melvina O'Neal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Marshall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Smallwood v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955