Legal Opinion
Christopher T. v. Fiserv Correspondent Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 7, 2001No. CV-00-1415-MAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
This action arises from a decision rendered by an arbitration panel (“panel”) on September 28, 2000, in favor of Plaintiffs, and against Defendants. On November 29, 2000, the panel issued a Supplemental Award in which they awarded Plaintiffs $101,250 in costs and attorneys fees. Plaintiffs seek an order confirming the arbitration award (# 1), and an order confirming the supplemental award (# 16). Defendant Fiserv Correspondent Services, Inc. (“Fiserv”) seeks an order vacating the award against Fiserv, including all findings of fact and law as applied to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sandra S. Thompson v. Tega-Rand International, Albert Denola, Dba the Box Factory, and Runner's World Magazine Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Michigan Mutual Insurance Company v. Unigard Security Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,361 Wayne Carlson v. Bear, Stearns & Company Incorporated, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Cacciola v. Kochcapital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- McDaniel v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Klein v. Oppenheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2005
- Kostoff v. Fleet Securities, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007