Legal Opinion
Rowe v. City & County of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 13, 2002No. C 00-03676 BZPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ZIMMERMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is defendant City and County of San Francisco’s (“City’s”) motion for summary judgment on plaintiff Rebecca Rowe’s claims under both the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (“ADA”) and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 12900 et seq. (“FEHA”). 1 Plaintiff alleges that defendant discriminated against her on the basis of her disability by denying her a reasonable accommodation through reassignment to a different position. For the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Lorraine Beck v. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and Chancellor John SchroederCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Diaz v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Enos v. Douglas CountyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020