Legal Opinion
Wirtz v. Malthor, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 30, 1966No. Civ. No. 1685PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
The Court reaffirms the Findings and Conclusions filed March 25, 1965 on the separate trial of the issue of whether or not defendants were engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Further trial was held March 28, 1966 on the issues of the defendants’ specific violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the amounts of unpaid minimum wages and overtime compensation due to employees, and the identity of any employees excluded from coverage under the Act.
Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1 is a schedule prepared…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McComb v. Frank Scerbo & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Wirtz v. W. G. Lockhart Construction Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- United States v. Robert K. Michaels and Margaret P. MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Wirtz v. Burton Mercantile & Gin Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1963
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wirtz v. Malthor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Wirtz v. Malthor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968