Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 10, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). We are of the opinion that the decision of the chancellor was correct. Prior to the bringing' of this suit, another suit had been brought to enforce the stockholders’ agreement for contribution to pay the losses of indorsers on the paper of the old corporation, and this case is reported in 175 Ark. 10, 299 S. W. 361, under the style of Murphy v. Winham.

' By stipulation of the parties, the record of the testimony in that case is made a part of the present suit.Upon appeal, it was said that the chancery court in that case correctly held that the value of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Altheimer v. HunterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  2. Murphy v. WinhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martindale v. HoneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API